In this message we again focus on the theological problems with Rome’s doctrine of Transubstantiation.

We provide biblical evidence that the institution of the Lord’s Supper found in 1 Cor. 11:23-26 had nothing to do with the literal changing of the elements of the Lord’s Supper into the body and blood of Jesus Christ.

We also discuss the significance of remembering and proclaiming the finished work of Christ until He returns to celebrate the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.